Dashboard

Financial News

'Out Of Africa': Beijing Slashes Investment Up To 85%
zerohedge44d ago

'Out Of Africa': Beijing Slashes Investment Up To 85%

'Out Of Africa': Beijing Slashes Investment Up To 85% Authored by James Gorrie via The Epoch Times,For more than a decade, China’s footprint across Africa has expanded at a phenomenal pace.Railways in Kenya, ports in Tanzania, energy projects across sub-Saharan Africa, and militarized infrastructure in various places have meant billions in state-backed loans. For decades, Beijing has positioned itself as Africa’s largest trading partner and its most aggressive infrastructure financier.But something has changed.In some sectors, such as energy lending by Chinese development finance institutions, investment levels have fallen by as much as 85 percent from their peak years. That’s not a rounding error, that’s a strategic retreat.What’s really going on? Is China walking away from Africa? Or is Africa revealing something deeper about China’s own economic stress?It’s all of the above and more.The Pullback Is Real—and SharpAccording to research cited by the Clean Air Task Force, Chinese development finance for African energy projects has declined roughly 85 percent since 2015. That’s a dramatic contraction in capital deployment.Separate reporting based on data from Boston University’s Global Development Policy Center shows that Chinese lending to Africa has fallen sharply in recent years. In some reports, China’s investment fell nearly 46 percent year over year in 2024.This isn’t just a pause. It’s a reset.For years, Beijing fueled infrastructure growth across the continent through state-backed loans tied to its Belt and Road Initiative expansion. Now, the tap isn’t fully off, but it’s not flowing as freely as it used to.China Isn’t Leaving Africa, but It’s Changing How It EngagesBefore jumping to the “China is out of Africa” conclusion, it’s important to note a few critical facts.For one, China remains Africa’s largest trading partner. Trade volumes remain substantial and have even grown in recent years.But lending and investment are different from trade.Instead of large sovereign infrastructure loans, Beijing appears to be shifting toward more commercially viable projects and private sector–led foreign direct investment. Beijing is also favoring trade expansion over debt expansion.That’s a broad policy shift. An analysis of broader outbound Chinese investment patterns in 2025 shows a more cautious and selective capital strategy globally—not just in Africa.In other words, China isn’t abandoning Africa—Beijing is abandoning risk.The Real Story May Be DomesticBut the context may be less about Africa and more about China. It’s no state secret that China’s economy is under real pressure, including a prolonged property sector downturn, persistent and high local government debt, slowing GDP growth, and weak domestic consumption.Those challenges have led Beijing to ramp up capital controls and financial risk management, both of which are indicators of a markedly different economy than the one for which China became world-renowned.In short, China’s days of double-digit expansion are long gone. A new malaise has set in that isn’t easily overcome. Chinese authorities are increasingly focused on stabilizing employment, preventing financial contagion, and managing demographic decline.When capital gets tight at home, overseas mega-projects become harder to justify—especially in politically complex or financially risky environments. Thus, Africa isn’t being punished—it’s being reprioritized.Even some critics of the “debt trap diplomacy” narrative note that China has become far more cautious as a creditor in recent years.Strategic Reassessment, Not Strategic RetreatChina’s Africa policy framework still operates through the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation, which continues to promote trade, tariff elimination for least-developed African countries, and development cooperation.Trade between China and Africa reached nearly $300 billion in recent reporting, underscoring that economic ties remain strong. But there’s a difference between facilitating trade and underwriting sovereign debt.China’s earlier model, which provided large, state-backed loans for infrastructure, carried political and financial risks. Some projects underperformed, and other countries struggled with repayment, becoming vassals of Beijing amid intensifying global scrutiny.Beijing appears to have decided to scale back exposure to such risks, tightening standards and investing where returns are clearer. That’s not ideological behavior but balance-sheet management.What This Says About China’s EconomyAn 85 percent reduction in certain categories of overseas investment doesn’t just reflect changing foreign policy. It signals that large-scale overseas lending no longer aligns with domestic priorities and that conserving capital is a necessity, as liquidity and risk appetite have tightened.Beijing recognizes that as economic conditions decline, domestic stability declines as well. Therefore, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is prioritizing internal stability by managing debt, stabilizing property markets, and preserving employment. At this point, it’s clear that these rising domestic problems matter more to the CCP than expanding geopolitical infrastructure influence.It’s not necessarily that the era of unlimited Belt and Road expansion is over, but China is entering a phase of selective, return-driven engagement over broad strategic underwriting.This is what economic maturation—or economic strain—looks like.Global Ambitions Meet Financial RealityThe CCP’s global ambitions are now bound by domestic economic reality. Overextension abroad while managing economic fragility at home is a dangerous combination.Pulling back could signal discipline, economic stress, or both. Economic stress demands financial discipline, and when the world’s second-largest economy tightens its checkbook by 85 percent in key sectors, the story isn’t just about Africa’s financial future—it’s about China’s.Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times. Tyler DurdenTue, 02/24/2026 - 05:00

#ECONOMY
dawn44d ago

Bloodbath continues as KSE-100 sheds over 1400 points on Tuesday

Pakistan’s benchmark index, KSE-100, closed in the red on Tuesday, down 1432.54 points.Topline Securities noted that the session witnessed pronounced volatility, with the index staging a brief rebound to an intraday high of +1,546 points before intensified selling pressure pushed it to a low of –3,783 points.Despite the decline in points, trading activity remained robust, with total volumes clocking in at 687 million shares and turnover reaching Rs38.4 billion.The top active stocks were led by K-Electric Limited, falling 1.17pc to Rs7.57 at a volume of 64,848,829, followed by The Bank of Punjab, declining 1.62pc to Rs29.70 at a volume of 49,139,683, and Worldcall Telecom Limited, falling 0.76pc to Rs 1.31 at a volume of 45,981,935.The top advancers were led by Abdullah Shah Ghazi Sugar Mills Limited, rising 12.32pc to Rs9.12, followed by Chenab Limited, rising 11.79pc to Rs9.48, and Ittefaq Iron Industries Limited, rising 10.49pc to Rs8.11.The top decliners were led by LSE Capital Limited.(Right) declining 20.62pc to Rs0.77, followed by Paramount Spinning Mills Limited falling 13.40pc to Rs5.62, and Gulistan Spinning Mills Limited declining 13.09pc to Rs6.04.This 0.85pc fall from its previous close of 167,691.08 points comes on the heels of the index’s bloodbath on Monday, the third major meltdown at the PSX in the past two weeks, with the KSE-100 losing 5,149.80 points on February 16 and 6,683 points, the steepest single-day decline in history, on February 19.Mohammad Sohail, CEO of Topline Securities, noted that the market is in “correction mode.” He stated that the current sell-off “appears to be driven by above-average foreign selling, Reko Diq-related concerns, softer corporate results, and stock futures unwinding”.Interestingly, he cautions against deeming this as a bearish market, calling it an “11pc correction instead”. AKD Securities believed that geopolitical developments and the outcome of the upcoming IMF review mission, due to arrive next week, will be crucial in determining investor sentiment.Investors will also be looking towards corporate earnings reports for a possible upside.Pakistan Oilfields Ltd announced its 2QFY26 results today. The company recorded a profit of Rs6.3bn, down 17pc YoY but up 16pc QoQ. This takes 1HFY26 earnings to Rs41.29/share, up 16pc YoY, according to Topline Securities.The brokerage house noted that earnings came out higher than expectations, driven by higher-than-expected other income and a lower Effective Tax Rate (ETR), which stood at 26pc in 2QFY26, compared to 37pc in 2QFY25 and 33pc in 1QFY26.Additionally, Hub Power Company announced its 2QFY26 results today. The company reported earnings of Rs10.6bn, an increase of 152pc YoY. Their profits were down compared to the previous quarter by 9pc due to higher ETR. According to Topline Securities, this result came lower than expectations due to a higher-than-expected ETR.

#STOCKS
Bezant Resources (LON:BZT) Stock Crosses Above 50-Day Moving Average – Time to Sell?
americanbankingnews44d ago

Bezant Resources (LON:BZT) Stock Crosses Above 50-Day Moving Average – Time to Sell?

Bezant Resources Plc (LON:BZT – Get Free Report)’s stock price crossed above its 50 day moving average during trading on Monday . The stock has a 50 day moving average of GBX 0.10 and traded as high as GBX 0.11. Bezant Resources shares last traded at GBX 0.11, with a volume of 70,813,313 shares traded. [...]

#STOCKS
Compound Planning Inc. Grows Stock Position in iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF $IBIT
defenseworld44d ago

Compound Planning Inc. Grows Stock Position in iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF $IBIT

Compound Planning Inc. increased its stake in iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (NASDAQ:IBIT – Free Report) by 496.2% in the third quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 88,378 shares of the company’s stock after acquiring an additional 73,554 shares during the period. [...]

#CRYPTO
GTBank fined $257k for breach of agreement with client in Kenya
technext2444d ago

GTBank fined $257k for breach of agreement with client in Kenya

The Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) has fined Guaranty Trust Bank Kenya Limited (GTBank) approximately $257,000 (Ksh33.18 million)...The post GTBank fined $257k for breach of agreement with client in Kenya first appeared on Technext.

#CRYPTO